Presentation at EIPPEE Conference 2013

Here is my talk entitled "Using ICT to support policy making based on evidence at national level".  It was presented on Mar 5th at  Evidence Informed Policy and Practice in Education across Europe (EIPPEE) 2013 Conference, held in Frankfurt, Germany.

This presentation is also available in the Confererence website (see Workshop 1: Using evidence at national, local and school levels)

New ISI Research Article

ICT for Education: a conceptual framework for the sustainable adoption of Technology-Enhanced Learning environments in school

Abstract ― Currently, the use of ICT in education does not conclusively demonstrate significant effects on learning. However, not all ICT usage models are designed to affect student outcomes. Therefore, to accurately study the impact of ICT, the concept of an educational programme supported by ICT must first be defined. We propose the ICT for Education (ICT4E) programme, an evidenced-based framework to determine a model’s ability to produce improvements before having to evaluate its results. The framework has four components: implementation, intervention, transference and total cost. Based on an explicit definition of the outcomes pursued by a given programme, this framework supports the design of its activities to promote sustainable changes in pedagogical practices in schools and calculate the programme’s total cost. We illustrate this with a programme implemented in 6 countries. In Chile, the ICT4E programme forms part of the policy for educational technology, evaluating the effectiveness and scalability of such initiatives.

Keywords: Technology-Enhanced Learning, pedagogic model, ICT effects, scalability, sustainability, ICT integration.

Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M., & Dombrovskaia, L. (2012). ICT for Education: a conceptual framework for the sustainable adoption of Technology-Enhanced Learning environments in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 291-315.

New project: Teachers automatic self-observation tool for improving pedagogical practices (2012 ― 2015)

Abstract This project aims to develop an automatic self-observation software for teachers, allowing them to gain rapid insight on the quality of their teaching in Mathematics. This software records the class audio from external microphones in a standard notebook every time the teacher actives it during a lecture. After the class, the software processes the teacher’s and students’ speech, detecting the contents of the curriculum taught and pedagogical strategies performed. The teacher receives a personal and confidential report about the development of the lectured class, if it went as planned and matched the sequence of classes in the unit. The system can also suggest increasing or decreasing  some teaching strategies based in the past recorded lessons.

We expect teachers could become more aware of their practices using this system, allowing them to improve their pedagogical strategies and thereby also contribute to improved students’ learning results. Finally, if students use online homework or assessment systems, the system can provide an analysis of the impact of the teaching strategies used on students’ attainment.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, semantic analysis, speech to text, automatic classifiers, education, ICT,  learning results, pedagogical practices

Funding source: CONICYT - FONDEF under grantt D11I1099

Presentation at EIPPEE Conference 2012

Here is my talk entitled "Models of study for ICT-supported educational programs, applications, and generalization to the non-ICT field".  It was presented on May 10th at  Evidence Informed Policy and Practice in Education across Europe (EIPPEE) 2012 Conference, held in The Hague, Netherlands.

Also available in the website of the conference (see Workshop 6 - Using evidence for innovations in education)

A researchers’ view on effective use of technology in education: "it’s all about the learning process, not devices" – Chile

Interview published on March, 05 2012 at DailyEdventures

By Anthony Salcito, Education VP of Microsoft Corp. 

When I asked Dr. Patricio Rodríguez what he thought about innovative technology in the classroom, his answer was unexpected coming from an engineer who has spent his life researching and developing educational technology. “I suspect that some education policies are a kind of ’innovative technology entrepreneurship‘ policy rather than real education policy,” says Rodríguez. “We put a lot of technology in schools to improve education – but is that for the entrepreneurs or students?”

An interesting perspective, given that Rodríguez has been studying, researching and developing educational technology for more than 15 years. From 1996 to 2008, he served as CEO and GM, at Eduinnova, a multidisciplinary research and development center of technology-enhanced learning in Chile. The company broke the barriers of  educational technology in many ways:  first through educational videogames on handheld devices, and second through collaborative learning activities on PDAs and netbooks. His team implemented projects in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, United Kingdom and the United States. He is now at the Center for Advanced Research in Education, where they are developing an analytical tool for supporting the development of public policies.

Rodríguez’s healthy dose of skepticism does not mean he’s anti-technology in education. He simply believes we need to change the discussion. “Why? Why are we using this, and how does this tool help students learn? Engineers are always trying to solve a problem with tools and objects,” says Rodríguez. “We are happy when we design a new device. We believe we will make miracles in your classroom. But it’s not about the gadget or the machine. It’s about the process.”

Right now, Rodríguez is questioning the latest educational technology buzz: eBooks. “When computer-makers talk about eBooks and that they will replace traditional books in school – why?” says Rodríguez. “Technology brings an opportunity to do things differently. A book is a book.  Making it electronic is not transformational – that’s not going to transform education! Technology is just a medium to try to do things in way that was not previously possible.”

All of his work means nothing, says Rodríguez, without the teachers. “We need more humility, and we need to work more with the teachers,” he notes. “The perspective of the researcher is that we are the guys who will change everything … but the teachers are the key to transforming education. Without working together, we can’t change anything.”

So, where does Rodríguez see this in practice today? He points to the innovative pedagogy of Colegio Fontán and Julio Fontán. “The Fontán pedagogy has made an innovative change in education and student-centered learning,” says Rodríguez. “They use technology, but his pedagogy is not technology dependant. My favorite example of this is eyeglasses. You need them, but you’re not constantly thinking about your glasses. Technology has to work that way – it must become invisible. We will succeed when we no longer discuss terms like ‘ICT, educational technology, technology-enhanced learning environment,’ etc. If such terms exist, they draw a line between things that should be completely integrated. Educational technology must be like eyeglasses: you forget when you are using it, but you need to use it.” 

The original post here.